WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Problems with network-route/vif-route scripts

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Problems with network-route/vif-route scripts
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年10月30日 03:22:15 +0000
Delivery-date: 2006年10月29日 19:22:42 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20061030020852.GA609@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20061026161750.GB28762@xxxxxxxxxx> <20061030020852.GA609@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 06:08:52PM -0800, John McCullough wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:17:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > I've been attempting to get the network-route/vif-route scripts running
> > instead of using the traditional bridging setup, but running into some
> > puzzelling issues.
>
> Are you using an hvm or pv guest?
Nope, this was all with paravirt guests. I think I've got the problem 
sorted out now, so I'll try & post a patch for the pv network scripts
tomorrow sometime.
> Routing under hvm requires a bit of hacking. Qemu uses /dev/tap*
> devices rather than the vif*.* devices and is by default invoked in a
> bridging mode (the default /etc/xen/qemu-ifup script that is invoked by
> qemu-dm on launch simply adds the tap device to the bridge xenbr0).
>
> I've found that turning the vif script executed by xend into a no-op,
> changing the qemu-ifup script to invoke a vif-like script with the
> correct vif and XENBUS_PATH defined, and modifying image.py to invoke
> qemu-dm without the bridging.
Ok, I'll take a look at the pv stuff too - we ought to make sure both
pv & hvm work in the same way if feasible.
Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [XM-TEST] Fix xm-test suite for x86-64 , Tony Breeds
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Correct copy-n-paste error , Tony Breeds
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Problems with network-route/vif-route scripts , John McCullough
Next by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Problems with network-route/vif-route scripts , Ian Pratt
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /