WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Using SCSI and IDE frontend devices

To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Using SCSI and IDE frontend devices
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年10月26日 10:27:34 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年10月26日 02:28:00 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20061025175313.GD16944@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20061025175313.GD16944@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 02:53:13PM -0300, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >From my comprehension, (correct me if I'm wrong), xvd frontend devices
> should be used instead of hd and sd devices in the medium/long term. By
> now, using sd devices does not even seems to always work. Shouldn't it
> be te case for us to deprecate it's usage?
>
> I got a simple patch that does it in case it's of interest, but some
> questions still remains, like: Is leaving the message enough, or can we
> do better, by making sure a xvd is used, even if it was not requested?
It's the case that we want to deprecate sd and hd in the case of PV Linux, but
for HVM, we use the hd names to communicate with QEMU, and that's not a
problem because the guest doesn't see the device in the same way, and for
non-Linux PV guests, they are welcome to do whatever they want in terms of
device numbers.
For those reasons, we certainly can't force xvd when it wasn't requested. We
even can't force it for Linux PV, as this would break older guests.
I think deprecation by documentation only is probably the best way.
Ewan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Force BR_URL decison into final Makefile. , Ewan Mellor
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]mini-os: Switch to newer HYPERVISOR_sched_op() interface , Dietmar Hahn
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] Using SCSI and IDE frontend devices , Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Make SEXPR HTTP service multi-threaded , Daniel P. Berrange
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /