On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:59:30PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Instead of throwing a VmError, could you subclass VmError with a more 
> specific error and throw that?
Fore sure I can. But what does this condition have so differently from
others that justifies that for it only? Although I agree with you that 
such a specificiness is good, VmError is being thrown everywhere, meaning 
that your proposal would require touching a great amount of code change.
Is there any plans/opposals for that?
 
-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Red Hat Inc.
"Free as in Freedom"
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel