| To: | Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][ACM] 2/3: make ACM architecture independent (Xen part) |
| From: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2006年10月18日 17:35:59 +0100 |
| Cc: | sailer@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年10月18日 09:36:33 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1161187026.25656.68.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Acby033YvIGjll7GEduNMwAX8io7RQ== |
| Thread-topic: | [PATCH][ACM] 2/3: make ACM architecture independent (Xen part) |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 |
On 18/10/06 16:57, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch moves the multiboot-specific part of the ACM initialization > into its own file. Any architecture that implements the multiboot > specification should be able to reuse this function for booting a > machine with an ACM policy. > It also moves the x86-specific functions into an x86 include file. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> Hmm... It's a single small function with a fairly nasty interface. I don't think making it arch-independent is a good idea. I already shrunk the function down a bit when applying Tristan's patch so it's not actually very big. My main issue is that it is intertwined with the variables that setup.c maintains to track multiboot modules. It would be cleaner to make more of setup.c arch-independent and carry the acm_multiboot function with it. All the while the rest is inside arch/x86, I think acm_multiboot should stay there too. I did take your third patch, by the way (tools alignment change). -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add support for OpenBSD , Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add support for OpenBSD , Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH][ACM] 2/3: make ACM architecture independent (Xen part) , Stefan Berger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][ACM] 2/3: make ACM architecture independent (Xen part) , Stefan Berger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |