On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:58:46PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> >> Doesn't empty XKERNELS variable get you this for free? I thought that was
> >> the point of moving KERNELS/XKERNELS to Linux.mk.
> >
> > We need this as well because of things like:
> >
> > for i in $(XKERNELS) ; do $(MAKE) $$i-prep || exit 1; done
>
> But bash can handle empty lists. If XKERNELS is empty the above should be a
> no-op, right? Certainly seems to have that behaviour for me.
Ah. This patch obviously predates the "use bash for SHELL" one. You're
right, it's not necessary, and can be dropped.
thanks
john
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel