WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix asm syntax

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix asm syntax
From: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年10月17日 16:42:55 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年10月17日 08:43:19 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <453513EC.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20061017134008.GB7579@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C15AB03B.2A8D%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061017151544.GA11816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <453513EC.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:33:32PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >However, I don't think there's a disadvantage to the more compatible
> >syntax, is there?
>
> While not producing bad side effects here (as Keir convinced me), it is
> generally wrong (i.e. it would work right only because of the more than
> odd constraint on the operand, which are needed to work around a
> quirk in the assembler that was fixed about ten months ago). However,
> the / prefix separation in general has been supported for far more than
> a year, so I wonder what specific problem you were seeing (and with
> how old an assembler)...
The standard GNU ld is currently still 2.15 on Solaris. If there's
serious objections to not using the newer syntax, we can always keep it
as a local hack until we've updated. We're releasing our sources after
all.
regards,
john
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix asm syntax , Jan Beulich
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix asm syntax , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix asm syntax , Jan Beulich
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix asm syntax , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /