WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Insane contiguous physical memory requirements in blkbk/

To: Aron Griffis <aron@xxxxxx>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Insane contiguous physical memory requirements in blkbk/blktap
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年10月05日 16:47:51 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年10月05日 08:48:25 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20061005153838.GA25054@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcbolZ0X294koFSIEduatwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Insane contiguous physical memory requirements in blkbk/blktap
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
On 5/10/06 16:38, "Aron Griffis" <aron@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> But is there any need at all for these pages to be contiguous?
>
> I've been looking at the exact same question, but don't know the
> answer. If you come up with a patch before I do, I'd be thrilled to
> test it.
This is easily fixable. Anywhere we use the virtual address to compute an
offset into a state structure, we can instead store the appropriate 'slot
index' in a spare field in the appropriate 'struct page'. That'll get rid of
any arithmetic on the virtual addresses that depends on them being
contiguous. Then the drivers can simply grab a bag of order-0 allocations.
That really only leaves the question of how much of this can be put in a
helper function (probably in balloon driver again) for use of all our
drivers.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Insane contiguous physical memory requirements in blkbk/blktap , Aron Griffis
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add RDMSR/WRMSR instruction emulation toVMXAssist decoder , Tim Deegan
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Insane contiguous physical memory requirements in blkbk/blktap , Aron Griffis
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Insane contiguous physical memory requirements in blkbk/blktap , Stephen C. Tweedie
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /