WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH,RFC 0/17] 32-on-64 work progress

To: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH,RFC 0/17] 32-on-64 work progress
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年10月05日 13:49:58 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年10月05日 06:16:32 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4524D34D.1050508@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4523EEB2.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <4524D34D.1050508@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx> 05.10.06 11:41 >>>
>Jan Beulich wrote:
>> In an attempt to get some feedback on the ways I'm currently implementing
>> this, I'm sending the set of patches as I currently have them. These permit
>> a 32-bit PAE Linux dom0 kernel to come up on a 64-bit hypervisor, but
>> progress only goes this far currently (very early during invocation of the
>> first user mode code page table permissions aren't set correctly yet, making
>> Xen kill the guest).
>
>Patches don't apply for me, which changeset these patches are based on?
11690. They may depend on a few changes posted earlier (and not in the
tree, yet), and I also didn't specifically check whether they would conflict
with any of the few changes I always do right away after snapshotting
the tree. There shouldn't be many conflicts, though. I didn't do that
because the intention was mainly to have people look at the conceptual
aspects, since, as I pointed out, things don't fully work, yet (though for
the problem mentioned yesterday I already know the fix, I just wasn't
able to implement this so far as I was given a higher priority job for today).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] Insane contiguous physical memory requirements in blkbk/blktap , Stephen C. Tweedie
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch rfc 1/3] xen arch header rework. , Gerd Hoffmann
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH,RFC 0/17] 32-on-64 work progress , Gerd Hoffmann
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH,RFC 0/17] 32-on-64 work progress , Gerd Hoffmann
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /