| To: | "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Invalid length provided for SMBIOS data |
| From: | "Andrew D. Ball" <aball@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2006年10月02日 10:10:40 -0400 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年10月02日 07:09:03 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060927180359.GL20056@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Organization: | IBM |
| References: | <20060927180359.GL20056@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | aball@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
This is seriously broken -- I'll write a patch as soon as I can, unless somebody beats me to it :-) Peace. Andrew On Wed, 2006年09月27日 at 19:03 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > I was running some tests of HVM guests on Fedora Core 6, test3 and came > across a potential issue with SMBIOS data. When running dmidecode in the > guest VMs it reports that the actual SMBIOS data size, does not match > the advertised size. eg > > "Wrong DMI structures length: 439 bytes announced, structures occupy 363 > bytes." > > I've tried this in a variety of guest OS (RHEL-3 32-bit, RHEL-3 64-bit, > RHEL-4 64-bit) all the same results. The host is running FC6 test3, but > the bit of code responsible for constructing the SMBIOS tables is identical > to that on the vanilla xen-unstable.hg repository. I'm not familiar > enough with SMBIOS specs / code to determine where the mistake in the > length calculation is though... > > Is anyone else seeing this length mismatch in HVM guests ? > > FYI, we're tracking this as > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207501 > > Regards, > Dan. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [HVM][SVM] Obtaining instruction address needs to mask to 32 bits , Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH 6/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Add configuration data for powerpc , Dan Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Testing Report for Xen 3.0.3 rc1 , Steven Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Invalid length provided for SMBIOS data , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |