WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Invalid length provided for SMBIOS data

To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Invalid length provided for SMBIOS data
From: "Andrew D. Ball" <aball@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年10月02日 10:10:40 -0400
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年10月02日 07:09:03 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060927180359.GL20056@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM
References: <20060927180359.GL20056@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: aball@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is seriously broken -- I'll write a patch as soon as I can, unless
somebody beats me to it :-)
Peace.
Andrew
On Wed, 2006年09月27日 at 19:03 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I was running some tests of HVM guests on Fedora Core 6, test3 and came
> across a potential issue with SMBIOS data. When running dmidecode in the
> guest VMs it reports that the actual SMBIOS data size, does not match
> the advertised size. eg
>
> "Wrong DMI structures length: 439 bytes announced, structures occupy 363 
> bytes."
>
> I've tried this in a variety of guest OS (RHEL-3 32-bit, RHEL-3 64-bit,
> RHEL-4 64-bit) all the same results. The host is running FC6 test3, but
> the bit of code responsible for constructing the SMBIOS tables is identical
> to that on the vanilla xen-unstable.hg repository. I'm not familiar 
> enough with SMBIOS specs / code to determine where the mistake in the
> length calculation is though...
>
> Is anyone else seeing this length mismatch in HVM guests ?
>
> FYI, we're tracking this as 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207501 
>
> Regards,
> Dan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [HVM][SVM] Obtaining instruction address needs to mask to 32 bits , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH 6/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Add configuration data for powerpc , Dan Smith
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Testing Report for Xen 3.0.3 rc1 , Steven Smith
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Invalid length provided for SMBIOS data , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /