WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Stability of shared info structs?

To: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Stability of shared info structs?
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年7月30日 18:07:34 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年7月30日 10:15:54 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060730120053.GA3352@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060730120053.GA3352@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 30 Jul 2006, at 13:00, John Levon wrote:
appears to have modified the size of struct arch_shared_info, as far as
I know, after the interface was supposed to be stable. This would have
broken any 3.0 domUs using the size of the shared_info structure for
whatever reason. Was this an error, or is the implication that a domU
cannot take the size of certain shared structures (and if so, which
ones)?
Since shared_info is always in a Xen-provided page, we think it's okay to add extra entries to the end of it. I don't think we could get away with that with any of the other public structures. We might add an extra field for introspection -- it depends precisely what it's for. There are one or two fields used for communicating between guest and tools, but that isn't what shared_info was originally intended for. It might, for example, be better to use xenstore.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] Kernel crashed if ther were much network traffic , Ian Pratt
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Stability of shared info structs? , John Levon
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] Stability of shared info structs? , John Levon
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Stability of shared info structs? , John Levon
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /