WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][XEND] Fix HVM Domain Creation When No Vifs Confi

To: Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][XEND] Fix HVM Domain Creation When No Vifs Configured
From: Daniel Stekloff <dsteklof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年7月13日 14:46:35 -0700
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年7月13日 14:47:05 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C0DC7A6A.A4BC%Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C0DC7A6A.A4BC%Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2006年07月13日 at 22:32 +0100, Christian Limpach wrote:
> Dan,
>
> > Currently - with the new qemu code, HVM domain creation will fail if a
> > vif isn't configured. Xm-test will not pass sanity tests to run. The new
> > qemu expects "-net none", otherwise it defaults to "-net nic -net
> > user". 
> > 
> > This patch simply adds "-net none" to the qemu-dm cmdline if no vifs are
> > configured. 
> > 
> > Please apply this patch or something similar, xm-test is broken for HVM
> > testing without it.
>
> I've been meaning to look into this. I think I'd like to take a slightly
> different approach: change the default in qemu to be -net none.
> I'll get to it eventually, but if you want to look into providing a patch,
> that would be great!
I thought about that... but shouldn't we keep the number of changes to
qemu to a minimum? Why support more and more specific xen changes to
qemu than necessary? 
Thanks,
Dan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][XEND] Fix HVM Domain Creation When No Vifs Configured , Christian Limpach
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow the block script to retry losetup -d , Kirk Allan
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][XEND] Fix HVM Domain Creation When No Vifs Configured , Christian Limpach
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][XEND] Fix HVM Domain Creation When No Vifs Configured , Christian Limpach
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /