On Wednesday 12 July 2006 03:44, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Now that xen and kernel support passive domains and the kinks are > being ironed out, I wonder whether anybody got a clean userland patch > against *current* oprofile. I saw Renato's patch against 0.8.2, but > it doesn't apply cleanly to 0.9.1. I can certainly merge it myself, > but if you did already, please share. > The attached is what I am using for oprofile-0.9.1. It is a version of Renato's patch. YMMV. > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel -- Ray Bryant AMD Performance Labs Austin, Tx 512-602-0038 (o) 512-507-7807 (c)
Attachment:
oprofile_0.9.1_passive_fixes.patch
Description: Text Data
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] PATCH: rewrite of lomount , Tristan Gingold |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Xen Roadmap proposal , Ian Pratt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support fixes , Markus Armbruster |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support fixes , DaSilva, Rosilmildo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |