WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] HVM SMBIOS support 1/6

To: "Andrew D. Ball" <aball@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] HVM SMBIOS support 1/6
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年7月11日 19:34:50 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年7月11日 11:42:17 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1152641541.5663.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1152301009.7155.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <442fabca27c99ca77e25120f23a73bbc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152641541.5663.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 11 Jul 2006, at 19:12, Andrew D. Ball wrote:
Do you see any other things to work on for the SMBIOS patches? Making
SMBIOS not optional cuts down on a bit of the code, so I'm working on
that and getting the code to run on the latest changeset today.
I think they're basically okay. I find it a bit weird that hvmloader puts SMBIOS tables in a fixed place and then rombios copies them -- not sure why that's needed but I suppose you're only copying what is done for ACPI tables. Couldn't hvmloader write all BIOS tables to a safe location and be done with them, or is the problem that 0xf0000 upwards is not available at the time hvmloader runs? Also, is the e820 reservation entry actually valid: 0x9f000-0xA0000 is reserved, but rombios copies the tables out of that area, right? Does rombios also update the e820 table?
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] HVM SMBIOS support 1/6 , Andrew D. Ball
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support fixes , Ray Bryant
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] HVM SMBIOS support 1/6 , Andrew D. Ball
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] HVM SMBIOS support 1/6 , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /