| To: | "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Virtual frame buffer: frontend |
| From: | "Christian Limpach" <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2006年7月10日 11:57:22 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年7月10日 03:57:43 -0700 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Fy0wcHaJ9369iLUM6VDlL52hHK629TTlNLuu0wNS8VevfubR21TWD8ZzlQixbiRx9cH03r5Di4x9Mlf02L5a/m0dP/mCZp2EGiu2RxGRPQSL5J03OuPRy6jyjvfz2NsBUlsUIKqhlmlg7EmSjZZ0tfU4zlBpJ1R+AJW7NEU7Qvg= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87veq5syfx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <87ac80ghox.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8764ioghnn.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3d8eece20607070945saad66c2hfc29b765db0c06bc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87veq5syfx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 7/10/06, Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Additionally, I think that the dirty region protocol doesn't really > perform too well in quite simple usage cases like having video play in > one corner of the screen and the mouse being moved in the opposite > corner. It's probably good enough for this version and supporting > this protocol in the future isn't too bad. There's been some discussion on this. I'm not sure what bottom line emerged, if any. Do we have to improve this before it can be merged? Or before it can be declared stable? Or just eventually? Unless it's the latter: do we already know in which direction to go?
I think the current stuff is good enough and the current protocol is not hard to support even if we have something better in the future, i.e. a guest using the current protocol is easy to support in a backend which also supports smarter ways of passing dirty region information. Thank you for working on this! christian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] VMX status report 10648:30cdeb686b93 , Zheng, Jeff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] how to disable the NX flag in a domU? , Hans-Christian Armingeon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Virtual frame buffer: frontend , Markus Armbruster |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Virtual frame buffer: frontend , Markus Armbruster |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |