WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: A credit scheduler issue

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: A credit scheduler issue
From: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:50:26 +0800
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Emmanuel Ackaouy <ack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年7月06日 03:50:58 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcacFJzRWXT2iFvbSlmiMrtTDqv9gQE09GqA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: A credit scheduler issue
>Although you may have spotted a performance bug that should be looked 
>into (if this migration happens significantly frequently), it *should 
>not* be a correctness bug! I don't think the fixes for the 
>HVM-and-credit-sched bugs lie in the credit scheduler itself. :-)
>
Hi Keir,
we just found the root cause of IA32 HVM guests can not run on 64 bit
host with the default credit scheduler.
credit scheduler migrates HVM vcpu from logical precessor from time to
time, but on x86_64 hypervisor, in __context_switch, we have 
 if ( !is_idle_vcpu(p) )
 {
 memcpy(&p->arch.guest_context.user_regs,
 stack_regs,
 CTXT_SWITCH_STACK_BYTES);
 unlazy_fpu(p);
 p->arch.ctxt_switch_from(p);
 }
 if ( !is_idle_vcpu(n) )
 {
 memcpy(stack_regs,
 &n->arch.guest_context.user_regs,
 CTXT_SWITCH_STACK_BYTES);
And CTXT_SWITCH_STACK_BYTES is defined as (offsetof(struct
cpu_user_regs, es)).
The definition of CTXT_SWITCH_STACK_BYTES on x86_64 is OK for 64 bit
guests, no matter para guests or HVM guests, but for 32 bit HVM guests,
since segments registers are skipped, it's buggy.
I'd perfer to define CTXT_SWITCH_STACK_BYTES to sizeof(struct
cpu_user_regs).
How about your opinion?
Thanks
-Xin 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [Xen-devel] Re: A credit scheduler issue, Li, Xin B <=
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: credit scheduler: the policy of credit assignment , Emmanuel Ackaouy
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Add uuid check to domain creation , Masaki Kanno
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] RE: GDB and exec mode on xen , Tan, Nicholas
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Add uuid check to domain creation , Masaki Kanno
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /