WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Blktap: Userspace file-based image support. (RFC

To: Andrew Warfield <andrew.warfield@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Blktap: Userspace file-based image support. (RFC)
From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年6月30日 14:35:53 +0100
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Chesterfield <julian.chesterfield@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年6月30日 06:36:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <eacc82a40606290734v623dfb90ye8589d770ffc0c42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <eacc82a40606190919x4bd4ef22m9d8431e650e85a67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1151552130.14360.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <eacc82a40606282224j622bbb0h32bb5b4bf2911612@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1151562666.14360.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <eacc82a40606290734v623dfb90ye8589d770ffc0c42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
On Thu, 2006年06月29日 at 07:34 -0700, Andrew Warfield wrote:
> The linux libaio stuff is pretty good actually. Requests map rather
> directly down onto the kernel bio interface, so with aio the userland
> block back code is doing a very similar thing to the in-kernel driver.
Yep. I noticed that the blktap patch includes adding EPOLL to kernel
aio, though, and that has not (yet) been accepted upstream; is that
something that is absolutely necessary for blktap, or could you live
without it? 
Is there any movement towards getting that upstream, since otherwise
we're introducing dependencies on core kernel infrastructure that is not
guaranteed to persist upstream? It looks like the sort of thing that
would be entirely reasonable upstream: EPOLL for aio seems to make a ton
of sense.
Cheers, 
 Stephen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH - proposed] XI Shadow Page Table Mechanism] , Steve Ofsthun
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Blktap: Userspace file-based image support.(RFC) , Stephen C. Tweedie
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Blktap: Userspace file-based image support. (RFC) , Andrew Warfield
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Blktap: Userspace file-based image support. (RFC) , Julian Chesterfield
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /