| To: | Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] do_softirq() of Xen/IA64 |
| From: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2006年6月30日 12:40:29 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年6月30日 04:40:50 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060630104714.GB5853%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <20060630104714.GB5853%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 30 Jun 2006, at 11:47, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
I doubt that this is a worthwhile optimisation. I'll take the patch as-is, but add a comment.It is needless to use smp_processor_id() twice on x86. Should #ifndef be used around cpu = smp_processor_id()? Or should something like __ARCH_HAVE_DO_SORTIRQ be introduced?
-- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] do_softirq() of Xen/IA64 , Isaku Yamahata |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Easy user-space usage of xenstore , Jacob Gorm Hansen |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] do_softirq() of Xen/IA64 , Isaku Yamahata |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Xen Scheduler : What's the main difference between BVT and EDF? , rickey berkeley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |