WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Question Also regarding interrupt balancing

To: harish <mvharish@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Question Also regarding interrupt balancing
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年6月29日 18:20:36 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年6月29日 10:20:59 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <a33d0a9f0606290851r76d9438cr55565def4b987645@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <a33d0a9f0605220943q75af2d77m8fbf1508a2ad9a88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3289dc4a0f8d31e751f7fb5edbb0066a@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <a33d0a9f0606091139w5e5178f7x28d98db5721ceb76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <260b1f3e22421d58dd152a6969f106fc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <a33d0a9f0606100958i75dd812at1fa420966f92189b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9bae6f237b7ec1b9cd78ca745bee1e41@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <a33d0a9f0606121642k40b0b3cao5bc0473944ad2ee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0dc18039de2a59cc81de532ca1ba5f3e@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <a33d0a9f0606290851r76d9438cr55565def4b987645@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 29 Jun 2006, at 16:51, harish wrote:
And ran a quick netperf test. Noticed that the cpu utilization was around ~50% on pcpu0 although my interrupts were being pinned to pcpu2 and domU on pcpu3. That is when I noticed that vif#id.0 has a dynamic irq which is serviced by pcpu0. Does this irq always run on pcpu0? Considering that it is dynamic, I understand that we cannot change the affinity and so am wondering if there some other configuration related to it.
Again, we don't load balance in the kernel, but you could change its affinity to some other single CPU via the proc interface.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc] [patch] more 'long' in the hypervisor interface , Chris Wright
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] RE: Xen bug 647: Creation of Mini-OS domain causes certain xm commandsto hang , Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Question Also regarding interrupt balancing , harish
Next by Thread: Fwd: [Xen-devel] Question Also regarding interrupt balancing , harish
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /