WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [0/5] [NET]: Add TSO support

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [0/5] [NET]: Add TSO support
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年6月29日 23:26:09 +1000
Cc: Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年6月29日 06:28:14 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <e9220840c1d7241f72f58c1771c74d40@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060627120240.GA748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ce42ba97df34accef8d150fbbe251f4@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060628140239.GA9248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <d963f536d9918d951418dcf1b935d1d9@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060629002020.GA16348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <390960d535dacfea77754357cf9cc55e@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060629094045.GA20816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bc12b2d3847b6c6d03668954b8f3d25c@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060629124614.GA21911@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e9220840c1d7241f72f58c1771c74d40@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 02:20:21PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
>
> If you can recalculate it, why is the field required at all (both in 
> the skbuff and in the netif_tx_extra)? You previously said it was 
> needed because it can't be recalculated (until you get to the 
> segmentation code, which may be very late in packet processing).
It can't be recalculated in general (i.e., in netback). However, within
each protocol module it can be recalculated.
> We could calculate gso_segs for TCPv4 in netback, which is all we care 
> about right now.
I'd rather not add protocol-specific knowledge to netback.
Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [0/5] [NET]: Add TSO support , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix event channel notification loss on IA64 , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [0/5] [NET]: Add TSO support , Keir Fraser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [0/5] [NET]: Add TSO support , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /