WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Oops in xen 3.0.2 dequeue_signal [was: Re: DomU Oopsing

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Oops in xen 3.0.2 dequeue_signal [was: Re: DomU Oopsing on xen-3.0-testing changeset 8259]
From: Charles Duffy <cduffy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年6月26日 16:15:24 -0500
Delivery-date: 2006年6月26日 14:16:02 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49d22db6cf52e95faf921257860e9a0a@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <dohhlq476ドル1ドル@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e767sb$k0l1ドル@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49d22db6cf52e95faf921257860e9a0a@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)
Keir Fraser wrote:
Does it always crash in __dequeue_signal()?
Yes.
You might have to add some tracing in there to find out exactly which
part of the function it is crashing in.
Any way to do that with less performance impact than adding printks to what I presume is a quite-commonly-called method? This system is used by internal personnel; while its performance and uptime aren't critical, it would be a good thing if they weren't impacted more than necessary.
Also, try upgrading to 3.0-testing tip and see if you still get the problem.
Should it be adequate to upgrade this DomU only, or is there cause to also upgrade the hypervisor and Dom0? (I'm also building a kernel with debug symbols; I anticipate that this will let me get an annotated disassembled copy of the source in question, and thus figure out which line of source maps to the instruction offset from the top of the method we're in... at least, in theory).
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Domain saving and filesystem corruption , Anthony Liguori
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] FW: Is it a correct place for VBD information? , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Oops in xen 3.0.2 dequeue_signal [was: Re: DomU Oopsing on xen-3.0-testing changeset 8259] , Keir Fraser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Oops in xen 3.0.2 dequeue_signal [was: Re: DomU Oopsing on xen-3.0-testing changeset 8259] , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /