Am Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2006 12:55 schrieb Harry Butterworth:
> There's a patch in patches/linux-2.6.16.13 called rcu_needs_cpu.patch
> which provides rcu_needs_cpu for the 2.6.16.13 kernel which is the one I
> tested against when I submitted the rcu_needs_cpu_patch.
>
> I'm not sure how you are getting the 2.6.16.20 kernel. If this is a
> standard part of the xen-unstable build that is supposed to work then
> let me know how to invoke it and I will fix up the problem.
>
> But maybe you have pulled 2.6.16.20 manually, applied the 2.6.16.13
> patches manually and then done an hg pull and got the new patch in the
> patches directory but failed to apply it to your kernel?
I used linux-2.6.16.20.tar.bz2 from kernel.org, and patched it with mkbuildtree 
from xen-unstable.hg .
Can mkbuildtree automatically patch the kernel?
Johnny
>
> Harry
>
> On Tue, 2006年06月13日 at 15:05 +0200, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > kernel building doesn't work witth current hg unstable tree and 2.6.16.20 
> > on x86:
> > 
> > GEN .version
> > CHK include/linux/compile.h
> > UPD include/linux/compile.h
> > CC init/version.o
> > LD init/built-in.o
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `safe_halt': undefined reference 
> > to `rcu_needs_cpu'
> > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory 
> > `/usr/src/xen/build/kernelbau-20060613.3-xen-unstable.hg-nosmp/linux-2.6.16.20-20060613.3-xen-unstable.hg-nosmp-xen'
> > make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
> > 
> > 
> > Johnny
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
> > 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel