WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] (xen) Possible bug: Memory squeeze in netbac

To: Erik Hensema <erik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] (xen) Possible bug: Memory squeeze in netback driver.
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年6月07日 15:43:08 -0500
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年6月07日 13:44:02 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200606071752.26963.erik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200606062047.44746.erik@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4485F70E.4020602@xxxxxxxxxx> <200606071752.26963.erik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060522)
Erik Hensema wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 23:43, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a rather curious path in the code involving rate limiting
that I'm not all that familiar with. Does it help is you create
the domains with a large maxmem than memory? For instance:
maxmem = 512
memory = 256
Yes, it does seem to help. I've recreated almost all domains with 16 MB 'headroom', now I can create domains up until the point I run out of loop devices ;-) (6 domU's running ATM) I'll reboot tonight (or shutdown all domains and reload the loop module) and try to start more domains.
I suspected it would but I was hoping it wouldn't. Do this mean that the netback driver needs to be able to increase it's reservation? If so, should we be enforcing (in the tools) that memory < maxmem? Any thoughts Keir?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] USB support , Dugger, Donald D
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Rearchitecting IO Emulation for HVM Guests , Daniel Stekloff
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] (xen) Possible bug: Memory squeeze in netback driver. , Erik Hensema
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] (xen) Possible bug: Memory squeeze in netback driver. , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /