| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [X86EMUL] Mark MOV instruction as not needing writeback. |
| From: | "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:53:12 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年6月06日 11:53:54 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1FnWsC-00063S-By@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcaJbGse1kW8C5sLTeeyunMfbwYUQQALeYbw |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [X86EMUL] Mark MOV instruction as not needing writeback. |
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-changelog-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xen-changelog-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of Xen patchbot-unstable > Sent: 06 June 2006 09:25 > To: xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [X86EMUL] Mark MOV > instruction as not needing writeback. > > # HG changeset patch > # User kfraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > # Node ID 89d7acdd8951342c1d75a5485f732f8164e5ccb1 > # Parent 5e3827f7a93a96a1d043cb0e523a0f821830af94 > [X86EMUL] Mark MOV instruction as not needing writeback. [snip] > 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) > /* 0x88 - 0x8F */ > - ByteOp|DstMem|SrcReg|ModRM, DstMem|SrcReg|ModRM, > - ByteOp|DstReg|SrcMem|ModRM, DstReg|SrcMem|ModRM, > + ByteOp|DstMem|SrcReg|ModRM|Mov, DstMem|SrcReg|ModRM|Mov, > + ByteOp|DstReg|SrcMem|ModRM|Mov, DstReg|SrcMem|ModRM|Mov, > 0, 0, 0, DstMem|SrcNone|ModRM|Mov, > /* 0x90 - 0x9F */ > 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, Doesn't the same thing need to be done for 0xC6/0xC7? -- Mats _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Daily Xen-HVM Build Testing: cs10277 , Rick Gonzalez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Why is 'emulate' as good as writable PT's? , Andrew Theurer |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Daily Xen-HVM Build Testing: cs10277 , Rick Gonzalez |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Clear VGA video memory in BIOS , Donald D. Dugger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |