| To: | <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix missed_ticks() logic |
| From: | "Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:39:15 +0800 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年6月06日 01:46:01 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcaJRLIGHmr10TBERNCp9Esc9TTfnA== |
| Thread-topic: | [PATCH] Fix missed_ticks() logic |
Hi Keir, This is a small patch to fix missed_ticks() logic. Original one postpones pit timer a pt->period later if NOW()-pt->scheduled < 0. Thanks, Xiaowei
Attachment:
missed_ticks2.patch
Description: missed_ticks2.patch
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: X86_emulate.c: Shouldn't opcodes like single byte 89 have "Mov" modifier? , Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: linux-2.6-xen et al , Juan Quintela |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/9] Xen Share: Simplified I/O Mechanism , Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Multiple network-scripts ? , Christophe Devriese |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |