* Anthony Liguori (aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Why do we need CONFIG_XEN guards in xen specific files? > > Should setup-xen.c and e820-xen.c be built when CONFIG_XEN isn't set? Yes, but *-xen.c is temporary. Adding CONFIG_XEN annotations make the diffs smaller and it's easier to keep in sync with the corresponding file's changes. thanks, -chris _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] xm mem-set issues , Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 17/35] Segment register changes for Xen , Rusty Russell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux: eliminate E820 tables , Anthony Liguori |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux: eliminate E820 tables , Andrew D. Ball |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |