WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] live saving of domU

To: Jayesh Salvi <jayeshsalvi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] live saving of domU
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年5月10日 20:32:59 -0500
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年5月10日 18:33:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <871640aa0605101829m1736134bi9c167a6f74f8aeb8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <871640aa0605100840t14a9f9deqf5c9be99f56917b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060510163213.GF4954@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44621BDD.9060401@xxxxxxxxxx> <871640aa0605101206h2742f0d1o70c356bad797747c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44623F3A.9040308@xxxxxxxxxx> <871640aa0605101829m1736134bi9c167a6f74f8aeb8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060309)
Jayesh Salvi wrote:
On a little different note, it is amusing to note that VMWare has to do some tricky dance of junction point/snapshot, etc. May be VMWare virtual machines principally use loopback file systems for virtual disk - that's why they have problem in viewing the same file system from dom0 and domU (consistent or inconsistent). Xen allows devices to be used as boot disk. Hence the file system is visible from dom0 and domU the same way (at least RO from dom0). I might be wrong. Correct me if you think so.
Keep in mind, VMware and Xen are very different. VMware emulates a device. That device has state, I presume that they need to get their device into a well defined state. We don't have this problem as we can just detach and reattach all of the devices. Of course, VMware is advantaged in that they use shadowing paging so they do not have any of the canonicalization problems that we have.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
Jayesh
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything you can imagine is real
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] live saving of domU , Jayesh Salvi
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0 User Manual revision , xen
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] live saving of domU , Jayesh Salvi
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] live saving of domU , Jacob Gorm Hansen
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /