| To: | "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>, "Chris Wright" <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support |
| From: | "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 May 2006 18:45:45 +0300 |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年5月10日 04:54:01 -0700 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Ies4Rv1ibdYsAtB2N18JsPChoFLKYXFogfVCUtzK0uOrl8nNcTT14RaZVo24tr+gI0HHgH+o+Kwrp6lg+45TIbkgUJmFAKeqXfFqJgXWRkC4xVr2MV09o5O6h9NwfSGMYAgW3CMEdtJxB/1ON8Isgt+GlliiUHWPrCiXSdKRepg= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060509152240.GA17837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <20060509084945.373541000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4460AC01.5020503@xxxxxxxxxx> <20060509150701.GA14050@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p73k68v4444.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060509152240.GA17837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It's also wrong. There's more than one hypervisor and Xen shouldn't just > > grab this namespace. make it xen_ or xenhv_. > > You should reject the recent "hypervisor file system" with the same > argument then.
On 5/9/06, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I prefer it would become lparfs or something like that indeed.
AFAIK it's called s390-hypfs now. Pekka _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel Bug asterisk , Hans-Christian Armingeon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 15/35] subarch support for controlling interrupt delivery , Martin J. Bligh |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support , Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support , Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |