WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Can Xen deal with minors greater tha

To: David Muench <davemuench@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Can Xen deal with minors greater than 255?
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 00:10:45 +0000
Cc: Henning Sprang <henning_sprang@xxxxxx>, xen-devel List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年2月07日 00:22:34 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <bc0c36d30602061600u3a3550c4l5753e6a27d4854e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <bc0c36d30602030834o40776dfbya1f930093513863b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bc0c36d30602030954o936c010tb5ed2f683ce331f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bc0c36d30602061425p57ab80e7m21f0b0889339fcc8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43E7CE83.90308@xxxxxx> <bc0c36d30602061600u3a3550c4l5753e6a27d4854e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 7 Feb 2006, at 00:00, David Muench wrote:
David Muench wrote:
Anybody?
Should I file a bug?
Maybe check first if the problem still exists in xen 3.0.1
Henning
Can't, I am dependent on PCI passthrough. I'm hoping 2.0 isn't abandoned yet..
2.0 is only receiving simple bug fixes. This one would be painful enough to fix that we're unlikely to bother, unless we are sent a patch. I think it would break the 2.0 I/O interfaces anyway, as the 8+8 major/minor split is baked into the control interfaces.
PCI passthrough will be in 3.0 series within a week or two.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport , Rusty Russell
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simplerinter-domain transport , Rusty Russell
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Can Xen deal with minors greater than 255? , David Muench
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] pcnet32 device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization , Jonathan M. McCune
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /