WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] domUloader

To: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] domUloader
From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年1月19日 00:21:22 +0100
Cc: Xen development list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年1月18日 23:28:59 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1137607564.22846.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Kurt Garloff <garloff@xxxxxxx>, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen development list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SUSE/Novell
References: <20060116234330.GC17087@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43CCDA6E.5040608@xxxxxxxxxx> <1137607564.22846.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Hi Jeremy,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:06:04PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> The other concern with mounting is that there have been some cases where
> changes to filesystems have broken reading new filesystems with older
> kernels. It's a lot easier to get the library that supports more (and
> less has to be supported, so you're less likely to need to make changes)
> than to upgrade your kernel for dom0
I tend to disagree.
As the dom0 kernel drives the hardware and hardware drivers seems
to be the more prominent reason for moving to new kernel versions,
I would assume the dom0 kernel to be updated more likely than the
domU kernels.
And actually, filesystem forward compatibility is not that bad.
I'm not saying this can't be an issue, but I suspect it won't be
for most people.
Cheers,
-- 
Kurt Garloff, Head Architect, Director SUSE Labs (act.), Novell Inc.

Attachment: pgpqXsDstqZ1h.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] xenidc based blkback , Harry Butterworth
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Cleanup dirty code avoiding warning messages when compiling , Xue, Haifeng
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] domUloader , Jeremy Katz
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] domUloader , Anthony Liguori
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /