| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] dom0_mem more flexible? |
| From: | Marcus Hardt <marcus.hardt@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2006年1月13日 14:58:17 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年1月13日 15:36:10 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Organization: | Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.8.2 |
Hi There, just a short question about dom0_mem: It would be nice for me if it was more flexible, i.e. run my WS in dom0 with all the RAM available and only reducing that RAM whenever I want to start a domU. Is this supported? Is this planned? Thank you, -- Marcus _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make delaration and definition of xc_linux_save() the same , Horms |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] cdb: split cdb into arch independet/dependet part , Hollis Blanchard |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] HVM initiative , John Que |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] dom0_mem more flexible? , Ralph Passgang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |