WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] sysfs support for xen linux

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] sysfs support for xen linux
From: "Mike D. Day" <ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年1月11日 11:12:31 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年1月11日 16:19:05 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923)
On 5:21 AM Keir Fraser wrote:
Well, here's a question, and I really don't know the answer: It of course makes sense that the kernel maintainers want drivers to install themselves under /sys, and fit in with the whole kobject and hotplug infrastructure. But, for a few odds-and-ends special files that don't really relate to a device, is /proc also out of bounds these days? Seems to me that the kernel proc interfaces were designed to have a few random files thrown at them, in a way that the sysfs interfaces aren't. If the argument is really that random special files are a bad idea, that would continue to hold regardless of whether we move e.g., /proc/xen/privcmd to /sys.
I think that /sys is clearly the right place to put information about Xen, including version, domains and domain info, and perhaps info about xenstore. This is according to feedback received when I submitted my first (braindead) patch moving /proc/xen to /proc/sys/xen. Still I agree that we need input from lkml and am going to cross-post an RFC so we can move forward.
regards,
Mike
--
Mike D. Day
STSM and Architect, Open Virtualization
IBM Linux Technology Center
ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Fix the issue of system crash in vmx stress test , Ling, Xiaofeng
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] sysfs support for xen linux , Mark Williamson
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] sysfs support for xen linux , Keir Fraser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] sysfs support for xen linux , Mark Williamson
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /