| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 x86 + PAE with > 16 GB RAM? |
| From: | Derrik Pates <demon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2006年1月06日 17:21:10 -0500 |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年1月09日 10:24:42 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051018) |
Xen developers: My employers are interested in deploying large (specifically Sun Fire V40z) systems for use as virtual private server hosting platforms using Xen. However, in playing with Xen on another Opteron based system (with only 5 GB of RAM), I noticed that the PAE-enabled Xen build claims a 16 GB RAM ceiling. Some poking around in the source of the hyperkernel (specifically xen/include/asm/config.h) revealed that MACHPHYS_MBYTES seems to be the key limiting value, capping the system RAM at 16 gigabytes. Can this safely be increased? From my reading of the code, it appears that it is set as it is because each gigabyte of installed RAM requires a megabyte of RAM to be set aside for mapping tables and such. If I just increase the value of MACHPHYS_MBYTES to 32 (for example), should Xen boot and work happily, just consuming more RAM for its mapping tables? Please Cc: me with your reply, as I'm not subscribed to this list currently. -- Derrik Pates demon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Backports to 3.0-testing and/or 3.0.1 soon? , Robert Read |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] BlkTap status , Ian Pratt |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] BlkTap status , Dor Laor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 x86 + PAE with > 16 GB RAM? , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |