Ian,
 Oh, I see. I did not know about this reorganization of the xen/linux
tree.
 Do you prefer that I port the xenoprof patch into the
"linux-2.6-xen.hg" tree right now or wait for when the tree goes into
the xen repository?
 Thanks
 Renato
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 4:18 PM
> To: Santos, Jose Renato G; Keir Fraser; John Levon
> Cc: Turner, Yoshio; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jose 
> Renato Santos; G John Janakiraman; ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] xenoprof (xen)
>
> > From your message, I am assuming that you are agreeing to include 
> > the
> > "arch/xen/oprofile" modifications into the sparse tree when
> > it moves to the 2.6.14 (please, correct it if I am wrong).
> > Any expectation of when this should happen? 
>
> Well, arch/xen won't exist as xen is a subarch of i386/x86_64 in our
> 2.6.14 tree.
>
> See http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6-xen.hg 
>
>
> This will replace the 2.6.12 in the xen repository at some 
> point, after more testing.
>
> Ian
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel