WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] compiler errors in latest unstable from 20051027

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] compiler errors in latest unstable from 20051027
From: Adam Heath <doogie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2005年11月10日 15:11:31 -0600 (CST)
Cc: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2005年11月10日 21:11:39 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <c005261a5cac3653d5b167e3e1787911@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511091549531.1794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511091555190.1794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1131574116.3533.75.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511091703110.1794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <c005261a5cac3653d5b167e3e1787911@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2005年11月10日, Keir Fraser wrote:
>
> On 9 Nov 2005, at 23:04, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > It may fix the one error, but not the big one.
>
> You *must* apply the patches in patches/linux-2.6.x before building.
> They are not optional.
Well, see, that's the funny thing.
I was testing out the debs of unstable I made. The xen patch that is produced
calls the existing makefile targets. I take the patched 2.6.12 debian source,
revert that back to plain 2.6.12, then name the directory to what the makefile
expects. I then generate a diff from the patched tree against the original.
And this patch still failed.
However, I'll dig more into it.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Increase MAX_SKBUFF_ORDER , Ian Pratt
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] compiler errors in latest unstable from 20051027 , Adam Heath
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] compiler errors in latest unstable from 20051027 , Keir Fraser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] compiler errors in latest unstable from 20051027 , Adam Heath
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /