| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] obsolete mmuext_ops? |
| From: | Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2005年10月27日 15:31:33 -0500 |
| Delivery-date: | 2005年10月27日 21:57:38 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Organization: | IBM Linux Technology Center |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.8.2 |
I came across MMUEXT_REASSIGN_PAGE today, but grep can't find any in-tree users. Actually, it seems the same is true for MMUEXT_FLUSH_CACHE. Should these be removed? -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] monolithic versus modules , Ted Kaczmarek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] unconditionally enable the trace buffer , Rob Gardner |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] RE: Updated XenMon Patch , Jeffrey Buell |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] question about the effect of dom0's memory size on applications in domU , xuehai zhang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |