| To: | "Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Staus of split lock in pfn_inf on x86_64 |
| From: | "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2005年10月18日 17:04:52 -0700 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2005年10月19日 01:54:33 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcXUKc3Crd0fb/BTQc6o2XP34VbELgABtttQAAD/CNAAAq4g4A== |
| Thread-topic: | Staus of split lock in pfn_inf on x86_64 |
Aravindh, Hi I remember you proposed some changes to the pfn_info structure to avoid split locks, and I would like to know about the current status, i.e. are we still doing the lock prefixed instruction across cache lines? Jun --- Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Xen unstable/SuSE 9.3 install issue , Robert Hulme |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] patch(1) is required for building (was Re: [Xen-devel] Xen unstable/SuSE 9.3 install issue) , Muli Ben-Yehuda |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [RESEND] evtchn sanity check , King, Steven R |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Staus of split lock in pfn_inf on x86_64 , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |