Just a comment about these results:
> Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
> FC3pae | 78 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
> hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 55 | 33 | 0 | 1 |
> hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 | 66 | 20 | 0 | 1 |
> hs20.fc4_x86_64 | 56 | 32 | 0 | 1 |
> x235sles9nonpae | 77 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
> x305rh4pae | 76 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
> x305sles9nonpae | 53 | 32 | 0 | 1 |
> x335fc4pae | 64 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
The above list of PASS/FAIL results was generated with an old version
of xm-test because I forgot to update the link that David pulls from
last night. In tomorrow's report, we should see fewer failures, and
most marked as expected.
-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel