| To: | "Nicholas Lee" <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [Xen-devel] SMP dom0 and AMD64? |
| From: | "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Oct 2005 23:14:35 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | 2005年10月06日 22:12:12 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcXKv4XJiA0lc03eSGW/ulAymcGshwAAtyJw |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] SMP dom0 and AMD64? |
> I noted that the config on a AMD64 machine for dom0 defaults > to non-SMP and domU defaults to SMP. > > Is there a recommendation config for dom0 in this situation? > I recall reading a message saying SMP dom0 was more stable. SMP dom0 should work fine, but non-SMP is more stable. [The message you're probably referring to related to someone that had disabled UP_IOAPIC in their config.] Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: Add NAT scripts to xen/scripts/ , Ian Pratt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] SMP dom0 and AMD64? , Ian Pratt |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] SMP dom0 and AMD64? , Nicholas Lee |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] SMP dom0 and AMD64? , Paul Larson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |