WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] Fix stale-state issue with 'xm dom{id, n

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] Fix stale-state issue with 'xm dom{id, name}'
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:36:30 +0100
Delivery-date: 2005年10月04日 07:34:18 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87psqqh4ww.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <87psqqh4ww.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:54:55AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
>
> This is a resend of my stale state fix, which is yet unapplied. If
> there are issues, please let me know.
>
> Note that this fixes the issue poked by xm-test, as shown in the
> following snippet of David's latest FC3pae.report:
>
> > FAIL: 01_shutdown_basic_pos 
> > I had to run an xm list to update xend state!
Hi Dan,
I made a big change yesterday to XendDomain to make it thread-safe. As far as
I can tell, most of the problems that you've been seeing were caused by
watches firing and modifying XendDomain internal state at the same time as
each other and as the xm commands. This meant that it was pretty easy to
confuse Xend into thinking that domains existed when they didn't and vice
versa.
I would be grateful if you could re-run xm-test and let me know how it looks.
There might still be some bugs to iron out, but hopefully you will find that
the behaviour under xm-test is much improved.
We've got someone working right now on integrating xm-test with our automated
test/build infrastructure here, so I expect to be able to run all your tests
myself soon, but I would also appreciate your feedback on this.
Thanks,
Ewan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] xen_changeset : Mon Oct 3 05:26:29 2005 +0100 f22fba673196 updates 4k and 8 k kernel stacks , Ewan Mellor
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Question regarding behavior of virt_to_bus .... , Himanshu Raj
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] Fix stale-state issue with 'xm dom{id, name}' , Anthony Liguori
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] Fix stale-state issue with 'xm dom{id, name}' , Dan Smith
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /