WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domain in state p isn't destroyed

To: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domain in state p isn't destroyed
From: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 18:38:26 +0100
Delivery-date: 2005年10月03日 17:36:01 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jYalr44TbE6Z5qKqdLYHWsN7cFrdC+8lB2VdeovmImJb7PrpmyycjjQ8SUToozEcjQqxxjMF6VmM++2QwIEIUTZ0InugDb3fs2VjgycpEy3jVKdXCl4seVexH3q4XX540qxd9PjdiOPr6B9uCKEKHD7qh6P0MAYG6H9dXV5aJx8=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1128360382.16758.97.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <623652d50510030932o3312fc32n@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <623652d50510031008p15cec912r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1128360382.16758.97.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 03/10/05, Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005年10月03日 at 18:08 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> > On 03/10/05, Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Using recent xen-unstable. I execute 'poweroff' in domU. xm list in
> > > dom0 then shows:
> > >
> > > Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s)
> > > Domain-0 0 91 - 2 r----- 1123.6
> > > server 2 96 1 1 --p--- 0.0
> > >
> > > I can execute 'xm destroy server' manually now, but I thought it was
> > > supposed to be automatic?
> >
> > Well, I should add, it usually is. But sometimes odd things happen
> > when I try to shutdown.
> >
> > Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s)
> > Domain-0 0 91 - 2 r----- 1288.1
> > server 8 95 1 1 -b---- 18.5
> > server2 6 0 1 1 ---s-d 30.1
> >
> > xm destroy server2 is having no effect... how can I get rid of the server?
> >
> > # xm console cbcserver2
> > xenconsole: xs_get_domain_path(): No such file or directory
> >
> 4k or 8k kernel stack?
>
> 4k this is broken.
8k, dom0 and domU.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domain in state p isn't destroyed , Ted Kaczmarek
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Copy-on-Write Memory , Michael Vrable
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domain in state p isn't destroyed , Ted Kaczmarek
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domain in state p isn't destroyed , Chris Bainbridge
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /