WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 Status update

To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 Status update
From: "Scott Parish" <srparish@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2005年7月28日 20:30:45 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2005年7月28日 21:39:58 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D282827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D282827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 10:35:06PM +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
>
> > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~iap10/temp/xen-summit-2005-07.ppt 
> > 
> > The slides show >4g in green, and i'm pretty sure that's not quite the
>
> > case until we get bounce buffers or iommu working.
>
> Keir checked some bounce buffer support in a while back
> (dma_map_single). It's largely untested, though.
I must have missed this. Unless there is something i'm needing to
enable, the problem i've been working on with dma being attempted to
high addresses still stands.
> * Intel would get the standard s/w iommu working (just a case of
> ensuring we have a machine contiguous aperture beloe 4GB -- the Linux
> code currently uses the boot mem allocator rather than using
> alloc_coherent, so it will need a little tweaking)
Yeah, i haven't had much luck so far.
> * AMD would test gart support. Should just work...
>
> Since the vast majority of server platforms have hardware that is >4GB
> DMA capable, it might not actually be such a big deal in practice. The
> biggest pain is probably dumb SATA controllers. We definitely need more
> test coverage.
Right, i'm using a sata drive, it must be dumb.
sRp
-- 
Scott Parish
Signed-off-by: srparish@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 Status update , Ian Pratt
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] veth0 problems and network-route , wei huang
Previous by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 Status update , Ian Pratt
Next by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 Status update , Ian Pratt
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /