| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Does physdev_dom0_hide work with the unstable builds? |
| From: | malahal@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | 2005年7月14日 14:36:09 -0700 |
| Delivery-date: | 2005年7月14日 21:35:00 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
I used physdev_dom0_hide='(01:00.0)' but the device still shows up in the domain0. Is not supposed to work with the unstable builds? I am trying to use an Ethernet PCI card directly by a user domain. What is the easiest way to do that? Thanks in advance. Thanks, Malahal. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Support for official xvd major number , Jeremy Katz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Support for official xvd major number , Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Support for official xvd major number , Jeremy Katz |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] Does physdev_dom0_hide work with the unstable builds? , Ian Pratt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |