WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen as a kernel module

To: Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen as a kernel module
From: Jacob Gorm Hansen <jacobg@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2005年1月25日 17:59:52 -0800
Cc: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2005年1月26日 02:02:11 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050125173106.H89060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <41F6F13B.7040308@xxxxxxx> <20050125173106.H89060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
Kip Macy wrote:
I'm obviously partisan, but I think that would largely defeat the
privilege de-coupling that they're trying to achieve. Not to mention
nullifying the notion of a driver domain.
Is anyone actually using driver domains, other than dom0? It would be really cool if hardware vendors started shipping drivers in Xen-VM format, but until that happens I do not see much motivation for having multiple full Linuxes around just to achieve a limited amount of isolation. It is no secret that I much preferred the old and simpler model, but I understand that noone likes having to port drivers, and I guess this is one reason for the current state of things. With Xen inside the host OS kernel, you would get the performance of the old model, and the ease of development of the new model, plus potentially the option of running Xen on millions of Windows-desktops (I am sure the Silicon Valley VCs would love to hear that ;-)). With all the OSes currently ported to Xen, the Xen hypercall interface could become a de-facto standard for paravirtualized OSes, especially if Xen were able to run on top of Windows as well as on top of Linux.
Jacob
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel panic on xen-unstable from 24.1.2005 , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Serial console funnies , Chris Andrews
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen as a kernel module , Kip Macy
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen as a kernel module , Ronald G. Minnich
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /