WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again
From: David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2005年1月21日 00:48:58 +0000
Delivery-date: 2005年1月21日 00:50:09 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200501202241.06631.maw48@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <OF4FD724E2.54054596-ON85256F8E.0069ACC1-85256F8E.006DA126@xxxxxxxxxx> <41F02C8B.5010304@xxxxxxx> <200501202241.06631.maw48@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
Mark Williamson wrote:
Also, I suppose you will wish to prevent covert channels between
domains, e.g. domains communicating using various timing attacks (I move
the disk head to the other end of the disk if I wish to tell you
something), or by allocating/freeing certains parts of memory.
How much will you need to dumb down the VMs view of what is going on in
the machine to achieve this (not expose real time information, not
expose real page tables), and how much of a VMM will there be left when
you are done?
Well domains are not aware of each other's memory usage, so I wouldn't have thought that allocation / exposing real page tables would matter. (Except dom0 can of course see everything if it wants).
Information about other domains' memory usage is leaked via the
hardware->physical mapping.
Timing related attacks are somewhat trickier to eliminate covert channels in, although some randomisation can limit the bandwidth.
Eliminating covert channels is completely infeasible. I don't see any
value in aiming for this. It's not a useful security property in most
circumstances.
--
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] suspend operation in XEND , Mark Williamson
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Rebooting domain0 independent of other domains , Matt Ayres
Previous by Thread: Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again , Mark Williamson
Next by Thread: Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again , Mark Williamson
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /