WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability

To: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability
From: Adam Heath <doogie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:53:04 -0600 (CST)
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2005年1月08日 02:18:20 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1Cn2lw-0002G8-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1Cn2lw-0002G8-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:
>
> > So far, we are extremely happy with the stability of 2.0. Congrats.
>
> That's good to hear.
>
> Do you still use NFS root? Do you use 2.4 or 2.6 kernels?
Yup. Pure nfsroot. pxegrub, nfsroot dom0, nfsroot domU.
The only change, is that for 1.0/1.2, we used dhcp on the domU nodes. For
2.0, we use static routing.
> > Well, it took us a long time to actually deploy a working 2.0 server. The
> > default method of using a bridge broke the all nfs-root setup we had(our cpu
> > nodes are diskless; makes them easier to maintain).
>
> I want to get example scripts for a routed (as opposed to bridged
> setup) checked into the tree...
I'm not fully satified with the scripts; that abuse parameters for their own
nefarious purposes. Maybe when we convert the second machine to 2.0(it's 1.2
atm).
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability , Ian Pratt
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Is continuous replication of state possible? , Per Buer
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability , Ian Pratt
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] undefined symbol: xc_vmx_build , Paul Larson
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /