WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] i686 requirements

To: Antonio Vargas <windenntw@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] i686 requirements
From: Adam Sulmicki <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:03:03 -0500 (EST)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2005年1月07日 17:38:20 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <69304d11050107043464a38412@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <69304d11050107043464a38412@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Regarding XEN requirements to run, I'd like to know if there is any
important reason to require i686-class cpus (ie: ppro, p2, etc.. and
k7...). In my limited understanding of 386 arch, ppro added
conditional moves and PAE, perhaps even huge-pages (have to check this
one). Is XEN explicitely (as in, used directly on assembler code)
using any of these?
XEN is smart enough not to attempt to use PAE if it not supported.
As far as CMOVE and PSE goes, This my patch posted a while ago will fix it. You can find it on web in varous xen archives, for example
 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/4062
 http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10258941
it is important to note that it is against xen 2.0.1 so you must use
 bk clone -rRELEASE-2.0.1 bk://xen.bkbits.net/xen-2.0.bk xen-2.0.1.bk
instead of as
 bk clone bk://xen.bkbits.net/xen-2.0.bk
as mentioned in the above said email.
It has worked for me and Rupert Schlick, but other than that it had fairly limited testing. So the more ppl test it out the better.
I hope to port it to xen 2.0.2 and xen 2.0-testing eventually.
My motivation is getting XEN to run on my (aging) k6 server machine.
I'm not that familar with specs of K6 so there migt be other gotchas, but I suppose it is worth of a try.
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Is continuous replication of state possible? , Avery Pennarun
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Is continuous replication of state possible? , Ian Pratt
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] i686 requirements , Ian Pratt
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] Is continuous replication of state possible? , Per Buer
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /