On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 02:50:14PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> why 2.6 has a completely different ioctl implementation that doesn't
> actually do anything! Merging the two ioctl functions would seem a
> good idea.
Most of those ioctl's would seem to be handled by generic code. I'm
somewhat surprised that it's not the case for the GEOM one, I thought
it was.
 christian
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel