WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS?

To: Gregory Newby <newby@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS?
From: Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 2003年11月19日 15:40:37 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2003年11月19日 20:41:29 +0000
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031119202001.GC2404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200311190426.hAJ4Q6Dt004558@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200311182128.21248.clucas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031119183917.GC2312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1069269459.2376.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031119202001.GC2404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2003年11月19日 at 15:20, Gregory Newby wrote:
> The kernel might, but there's no ext3 tools (like mkfs.ext3) in the
> distribution. This is with the "install everything" option on x86
> SuSE, from a boxed CD set, but I'm not sure now whether it was the
> last 8.x version or 9.
>
> BTW, I'm not blaming SuSE for the problems with Xen....it just
> seems that the Xen developers are mostly using RH and variants,
> and might have made some assumptions that don't work with SuSE.
> I'm not blaming the developers either. I'm not blaming anyone,
> just "stating facts" (as Spock would say).
I understand ;-) Please cat /etc/SuSE-release. I just checked an 8.2
machine which has both fsck.ext3 and mkfs.ext3 after a default install. 
We've supported ext3 for some time.
-chris
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS? , Gregory Newby
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS? , Ian Pratt
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS? , Gregory Newby
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS? , Gregory Newby
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /