WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-devel] demo cd 3.0.3 on non-pae machine

To: "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] demo cd 3.0.3 on non-pae machine
From: Adriaan Peeters <apeeters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年12月01日 12:25:08 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年12月04日 02:01:49 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E178E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E178E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2006年12月01日 at 11:32 +0100, Petersson, Mats wrote:
> What CPU do you have that doesn't support PAE? AMD has had PAE since K6
> or K5 days, Intel had it before then...
This is the output of /proc/cpuinfo (while running Ubuntu edgy):
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.70GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 600.000
cache size : 2048 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm pbe up est tm2
bogomips : 1200.00
The machine is a Dell Latitude D505.
> Whilst I understand that someone may wish to not build Xen for
> themselves, I also think that the number of actual potential customers
> of Xen that has processors that doesn't support PAE are fairly
> limited... 
This machine is about 2 years old, so still appropriate to test the Xen
Demo CD, no ? :) I assume adding non-pae kernels just implies changing
the build scripts or doesn't new Xen support non-pae processors anymore?
-- 
Adriaan Peeters
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/02] Kexec / Kdump: ia64 build fixes , Ian Campbell
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [patch 10/10] Support transparant gunzipping in the readnotes utility. , Gerd Hoffmann
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] demo cd 3.0.3 on non-pae machine , ron minnich
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH] 1/3] [XEN] Use explicit bit sized fields for exported xentrace data. , Jimi Xenidis
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /