On 17/10/06 11:01 pm, "Aron Griffis" <aron@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Will xen-unstable move forward to (at least) 2.6.18 now?
This is certainly planned before 3.0.4.
> Will the tree structure change from the current sparse model to
> a fully-populated kernel? IMHO it wouldn't be too hard to use
> something similar to
> http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/linux-2.6.tip-xen.hg plus a top-level
> xen directory containing the hypervisor. Alternatively, since Xen
> isn't just Linux, maybe the hypervisor and kernels should be in
> separate repositories?
Perhaps. We might at least separate the kernel bits from the hypervisor
bits. We like working with a sparse tree as it's much quicker than cloning
entire Linux repos.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel